New Treatment for Uveal Melanoma: HEPZATO

Uveal melanoma is a malignancy of the eye that occurs in approximately five to eight people per million per year. Common symptoms include blurred vision, eye pain, redness, floaters, and irritation. Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy, and while several local therapies can be offered for primary disease control such as plaque brachytherapy, proton therapy and enucleation, effective therapies to control distant disease have been limited.

Two to three percent of cases present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Most common sites are liver (90%), lungs, bones, soft tissue. Risk of metastasis is estimated at up to 50% of those diagnosed. Regardless of cell type or stage, recurrence or relapse carries a poor prognosis. Distant recurrence of uveal melanoma has traditionally been associated with mortality within twelve to eighteen months. Cause of death is generally due to metastatic disease. Overall five-year survival is approximately 80%.

Use of genetic testing at the time of primary diagnosis is now recommended in order to identify patients who are at high risk for metastatic disease. Enhanced screening and imaging of the liver and lungs allow for identification of early disease. Improvements in liver-directed therapy along with systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy have improved life expectancy of those with this disease. 

The HEPZATO KIT delivery system, an advanced liver-directed therapy, was approved by the FDA in August 2023. It is the first and only liver-directed, high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic uveal melanoma in adult patients with unresectable hepatic metastases. The HEPZATO KIT is a combination of high dose melphalan (chemotherapy) plus a specialized delivery system. [Melphalan meets National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as a recommended liver-directed therapy.] This treatment first became available in US hospitals in January 2024.

Administration of HEPZATO requires general anesthesia and extracorporeal bypass of circulation; the procedure isolates the liver blood supply while limiting systemic exposure. Melphalan is administered by infusion into the patient’s hepatic artery for thirty minutes, followed by a thirty-minute washout. This treatment can be given every six to eight weeks for up to six total infusions.

The HEPZATO KIT is only available through the HEPZATO KIT Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program and the facility must follow the REMS protocol to obtain the kit. Before administration, the facility must obtain an authorization to dispense by contacting the REMS Coordinating Center to verify the procedure team is qualified to perform the procedure and administer the drug. In the US, only fifteen hospitals are currently approved to administer HEPZATO, with a goal of thirty-five hospitals by the end of the year.

The average wholesale price of the HEPZATO KIT is $219,000 per cycle, with a maximum of six cycles as noted above. This does not include the cost of hospital admission, administration, and operating room services which will include extracorporeal bypass of circulation. In clinical trials, the average number of infusions was four, with 37% of the 91 patients treated receiving the maximum six infusions.

Summary

  • The HEPZATO KIT is FDA approved to treat uveal melanoma in adults with unresectable liver metastasis.

  • This is another tool to manage metastatic disease. It is best used in experienced centers with melanoma expertise.

  • The kit is part of the REMS program with limited suppliers, and facilities require certification to perform the procedure and administer the drug.

  • The procedure may be repeated for a total of six infusions, six to eight weeks apart. Clinical trial data shows the average number of infusions was four.

  • Average wholesale price is $219,000. Multiply this by four and the cost is $876,000 for the average number of cycles of treatment, excluding hospitalization and other charges. Depending on cost of kit, length of stay and number of cycles/procedures, total cost could well be in excess of $1 million.

  • Given the low number of facilities that are currently qualified to perform this procedure, there is a high probability this treatment may be out of network.

  • An independent physician review may be helpful along with negotiations for cost prior to hospitalization.

Please contact your Summit Re representative as soon as you become aware of a request for HEPZATO. Our Summit ReSources managed care staff is available to answer any questions or concerns you may have. We will continue to investigate and provide information to our clients as this field of medicine continues to evolve.

Article written by Ginny Fisher, RN, BSN, CCM, Managed Care Specialist for Summit Reinsurance Services, Inc. For more information about how this may affect your plan, please contact your Summit ReSources care specialist. The following sources provided information for this article:

  • ETS

  • Interlink

  • AMS

  • MedScape

GLP-1 Drugs: Where We Are and Where We’re Going

While health plans struggle with coverage questions and the high cost of GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) drugs, there is no doubt they are not going away. These drugs have caused a revolution in the diabetes and weight loss arenas not only due to their success, but also because of their cost. With many more clinical trials underway to determine if these drugs will be useful in treatment of other diseases, plans should prepare for possible expanded indications in the future and begin to discuss how their coverage decisions may look.

The four most visible and discussed drugs are:

  • Ozempic, which is semaglutide and approved for type 2 diabetes. Manufactured by Novo Nordisk.

  • Wegovy, which is also semaglutide but approved for weight loss. Manufactured by Novo Nordisk.

  • Mounjaro, which is tirzepatide and approved for type 2 diabetes. Manufactured by Eli Lilly.

  • Zepbound, also tirzepatide, approved for weight loss. Manufactured by Eli Lilly.

There is a difference between Ozpempic/Wegovy and Mounjaro/Zepbound. Monjouro/Zepbound is a GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 receptor agonist. Whereas Ozempic and Wegovy are GLP-1 receptor agonists only. They do work in similar ways given both have GLP-1 receptor agonist properties. GLP-1s mimic a hormone produced in the gut to suppress a person’s appetite and regulate blood sugar.

Currently, approximately 80% of plans cover these drugs for type 2 diabetes. Coverage is far less ubiquitous for obesity and weight loss. List price is in the $1000-1300 per month range, with actual net price being lower due to rebates and savings/coupons from the manufacturers. Lilly offers a savings card for those with commercial insurance that does not cover Zepbound. It lists savings up to $563/month, reducing the cost per month to $550.

We are now seeing many more research studies for other indications and treatment with these drugs. Ozempic and Wegovy have recently gained FDA approval for patients with type 2 diabetes and known cardiovascular disease, as well as for adults with established cardiovascular disease and obesity or overweight. These patients are at a greater risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death. Ozempic and Wegovy are proven to significantly lower those risks. Medicare is now paying for these drugs in certain cases, which is new as Medicare has previously been forbidden by law to cover weight loss drugs.

Tirzepatide, the active ingredient in Mounjaro and Zepbound, is now being studied for treatment of kidney disease. Another clinical trial is in progress for Zepbound and its impact on cardiovascular disease. Lilly is anticipating the results of that study in 2025, potentially expanding its labeled indications.

Furthermore, Zepbound is being studied for sleep apnea and, with FDA Fast Track designation, results are expected to be submitted to the FDA midyear 2024. In a Phase 3 study, people on CPAP had a reduction in the average hourly number of apnea episodes by up to 30 (63%) compared with an average reduction of 6 for those who received a placebo. Lilly is also studying Zepbound for treatment of MASH (metabolic associated steatohepatitis) and has met its goal in a Phase 2 study. MASH is a leading cause of liver transplantation.

With the US in the midst of an opioid epidemic in which it is estimated that one person dies of an overdose every five minutes, Penn State College of Medicine is among the first to investigate the potential of GLP-1 drugs for the treatment of addiction. Early results from a small clinical trial look promising and they plan to begin a larger clinical trial later this year of GLP-1 drugs to treat opioid addiction in the outpatient setting.

A recently published retrospective cohort study published in JAMA Network Open on July 5, 2024, noted a decrease in eleven obesity-associated cancers (OACs) in patients taking GLP-1 medications. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), there are thirteen OACs: adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, post-menopausal breast cancer, colorectal cancer, uterine cancer, gallbladder cancer, upper stomach cancer, kidney cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer, meningioma, and multiple myeloma. GLP-1 drugs were associated with a lower incidence of ten OACs compared to insulin. The study revealed that type 2 diabetes patients prescribed GLP-1 drugs were 65% less likely to get gallbladder cancer and 63% less likely to get meningioma than those prescribed insulin.

Additionally, the risk of pancreatic cancer was 59% lower, and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma was 53% lower. Other cancers, including ovarian, colorectal, esophageal, endometrial, and kidney, were 48%, 46%, 40%, 36%, and 34% lower, respectively. The risk of multiple myeloma was 41% lower in those taking GLP-1 drugs compared to insulin.

Both Lilly and Novo Nordisk are testing pill forms of these drugs (currently they are given once weekly by subcutaneous injection). This would be appealing to many more people but historically it has been difficult for the body to absorb medication through the gastrointestinal tract. Several other manufacturers have clinical trials in progress for potential competitors. Many of these trials will end with data expected late 2024 and into 2025.

The success of these drugs as a non-invasive treatment for obesity has led to an estimated decrease of 15% in bariatric surgeries. In addition, peripheral businesses are now expanding to serve patients taking these medications. These services include areas such as nutrition coaching, dieticians, behavioral modification, exercise programs, and data collection and analytics to track it all.

Finally, the staggering costs of these popular drugs has come sharply into focus, with US Senator Bernie Sanders leading the charge. In an April 2024 letter to Novo Nordisk, the senator notes that while Novo Nordisk charges $1,349 a month for Wegovy in the US, the drug costs just $187 a month in Denmark, $137 a month in Germany and $92 a month in the UK. Ozempic costs $969 a month in the US compared to just $155 a month in Canada and $59 a month in Germany.

Novo Nordisk’s response suggested that those figures did not take into account the resources spent in the years of research and development, stating it spent $10 billion on development of GLP-1 drugs. Novo Nordisk also stated that it retains 60% of the cost and the other 40% goes to “middlemen” in the complex US health system. The CEO has agreed to testify before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions in September 2024.

Looking toward the future, one has only to look at www.ClincalTrials.gov to see the many studies underway and planned for these drugs. Conditions to be studied include the following:

Not only are these drugs are not going away, but there are also several new products in the pipeline. And as indicated by the list above of upcoming trials, there may be several new indications in the near future. Will the upfront cost prevent more serious and ongoing treatment in the future? The answer is yet unclear, but questions like this continue to loom larger. Each plan must review the possibilities and responsibilities it has to its members and organizations in order to make appropriate decisions about coverage.

Article written by Ginny Fisher, RN, BSN, CCM, Managed Care Specialist for Summit Reinsurance Services, Inc. For more information about how this may affect your plan, please contact your Summit ReSources care specialist. The following sources were used as reference material for this article:

  • Biopharma Dive.com

  • JAMA Network Open

  • Penn State Health News

  • Pharmanewsintel.com

  • Morningstar

  • Sanders.senate.gov